March 22, 2010

Dear Senator,

As the oldest and largest statewide tenant membership organization in  
the country, the New Jersey Tenants Organization (NJTO) has been the  
voice of tenants in New Jersey for the last 40 years.  With rents in  
New Jersey near the highest in the nation, its 1.1 million tenant  
families are understandably concerned with housing cost.  This is  
especially true of low and moderate income tenants, who are the most  
vulnerable.  With at least a hundred thousand low and moderate income  
families desperately in need of housing they can afford near transit  
and employment, we cannot as a state afford not to meet that need.   
To force these families to continue to live in overcrowded housing,  
in cars, in shelters, or just on the street is the wrong direction  
for New Jersey to move in.  Although we do not believe this is the  
intent of the sponsors, we do believe S-1 will do this by causing  
much less, if any, housing to be built or rehabilitated which is  
affordable to low and moderate income families.

It will do this by effectively eliminating the state enforcement  
agency (COAH), replacing the existing requirements with ineffective  
ones, and eliminating a major source of funding -- developer fees --  
which cannot realistically be replaced given the state's budget  
crisis.  If you need more details, please refer to the letter you  
received from the Housing and Community Development Network of New  
Jersey (attached), with which we agree in its entirety.

Please understand that we do not think that COAH is perfect.  It  
could certainly be improved.  Aside from not producing nearly enough  
affordable housing, the issue of CONTINUED affordability has not been  
adequately addressed, to say the least.  Any housing built under COAH  
or using State funding of any sort, should be guaranteed to be  
affordable in perpetuity and maintained in good, safe, habitable  
condition in conformity with the Hotel and Multiple Dwelling Act.   
That has not been the case in many of these buildings and complexes,  
and it makes absolutely no sense to build housing as being  
affordable, only to lose that affordability as rents increase faster  
than incomes, and habitability rules are not enforced.

For our economy to thrive, low, moderate and middle income working  
families must have the security of decent housing they can afford.   
We include middle income families as rising rents are pricing them  
out as well.  Municipalities which prevent rents from rising faster  
than incomes by realistic rent controls at or below wage inflation  
should somehow be rewarded by a revised affordable housing law.

We would be happy to work with you to shape legislation that would  
really address the crisis in affordability of New Jersey's rental  
housing.

Again, if it actually comes to the floor for a vote today, we urge  
you to vote NO on S-1, since it moves us in the wrong direction.  The  
better choice would be to hold the bill, and work with us and others  
committed to affordable housing in finding a real solution to the  
state's affordable housing needs.


Sincerely yours,

 Mathew B. Shapiro
President
New Jersey Tenants Organization

Below is the letter of the New Jersey Tenants Organization in opposition to S-1 which would prevent the building of new low-income housing and the rehabilitation of housing in the market to be sold as low income housing.              (This page may be printed and distributed for discussion.)

NJTO supports Low-Income Housing!
NJTO
389 Main Street
Hackensack, NJ 07601
Phone: 201-342-3775
email: njto11@verizon.net
Click Here for Letter of Housing & Community Development Network of New Jersey.